Hampshire College Allows Segregated Housing for ‘Historically Marginalized’ Students
It’s amazing that this is allowed and that some students choose it.
Campus Reform reports.
MA college offers voluntary segregation for ‘historically marginalized’ students
A Massachusetts college allows students to reside in “identity-based” housing communities, provided they have a “unique social identity” that has “historically experienced oppression.”
“These residential spaces give support to members of our community with social identities that have been historically marginalized in this country, and strive to counter systemic oppression,” Hampshire College explains on its website, adding that its promotion of such living arrangements “arises from our commitment to fostering diverse, socially just, and inclusive communities.”
An accompanying informational booklet further elaborates that “identity-based housing is an institutional structure designed to assist members of historically oppressed groups in supporting each other,” and “helps to create an added level of psychological comfort and safety for those who choose to live in those spaces, often providing the foundation for those students to be able to engage fully in the greater community.”
One section of the identity-based housing program consists of “permanent” mods, covering categories such as LGBTQQIAAP, Queer, Students of Color, and Women of Color. The “not-yet-permanent” mods include Marginalized Gender Identities, Asian Heritage, and Pan-Afrikan Diasporia [sic].
Students can also apply to establish new identity-based mods, though all such groups “must be unified by a social identity (such as race, culture, gender, or sexual orientation)” and “must currently experience or [have] historically experienced oppression within or outside the Hampshire community.”
MA college offers voluntary segregation for 'historically marginalized' students (Campus Reform)
Comments
In other words, if we assign them to separate living arrangements it stymies their chances to interact with non-marginalized people of no-color, which is racist – excuse me, I meant to say rayciss – and bigoted as it denies them a chance at normalcy, but if they self-segregate it is a sign of their empowerment.
Did I get that right? Looking back at what I just wrote it appears completely senseless. (Since that is the norm for leftists, the appearance is no doubt valid.)