Presidential Candidates And Action For Higher Ed
Peter Wood of Minding the Campus has some ideas about higher education for presidential candidates.
What Candidates Can Do For Higher Education Now
In 2014 Senator Marco Rubio lent his support to CASA, the Campus Accountability and Safety Act—the effort by Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill and New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand to strip the due process rights of students accused of sexual assault. The bill died that year but McCaskill and Gillibrand brought it back in 2015, and Senator Rubio renewed his support.
It is a terrible piece of legislation, and one that no reasonably informed observer of higher education who cares about the rule of law and individual rights on campus could support. Yet one of the mainstream GOP presidential candidates co-sponsored it, presumably because he calculates that it is “good politics” to be able to say he opposes “rape culture.”
This one instance of many testifies to how little attention our leading candidates pay to higher education. Americans, however, have been shocked to see students at Dartmouth, Princeton, Yale, and other elite institutions protesting against free speech—and college presidents bowing down before little ripped-jeans, tuition-subsidized junior-league totalitarians. Now would be a good time for some presidential candidates to come up with a real program for reform.
Comments
Where in the Constitution does it say that the fed gov should be doing anything in education? Education has problems because the fed gov got involved. So boot the feds and fix your own darn problems. You are supposed to be ‘educated” people after all. Oh wait, you’re mostly liberal. Never mind.
Another reason to dump Rubio. Everyone knows that Gillibrand and McCaskill are incompetent.