Should community college scrap remedial courses?

Josh White writes at the Washington Post:

Are remedial courses actually hurting community college students?

Four years ago, I stumbled across startling research that remedial courses in community colleges — a backbone of American higher education — often do no good, and that colleges do not adequately inform students about the true consequences of the placement tests that put students in those remedial courses.

Researchers Katherine L. Hughes and Judith Scott-Clayton in their 2011 paper said 92 percent of two-year colleges used placement test scores to decide if students would be consigned to remedial courses that they had to pay for, but for which they earned no credit. The College Board’s popular ACCUPLACER placement test failed to mention this critical issue, instead obscuring it with happy talk.

“You cannot ‘pass’ or ‘fail’ the placement tests, but it is very important that you do your very best on these tests so that you have an accurate measure of your academic skills,” a College Board guide said.

Huh? As Hughes and Scott-Clayton pointed out, the tests were used not just to measure skills but “as a high-stakes determinant of students’ access to college-level courses.”


 
 0 
 
 0