Tufts President Steps Up to Protect Free Speech
The President of Tufts University should be applauded. While others demand to limit free speech, President Anthony Monaco has chosen to support the first amendment.
Will the rest of Tufts and other colleges follow his example?
Tufts president promises to protect speech ‘no matter how unpopular or provocative’
Tufts University President Anthony Monaco is tired of dealing with the heckler’s veto against unpopular speakers or programs on campus, he writes in a Tufts Daily op-ed:
It is our responsibility to offer and encourage opportunities for our students to debate and contemplate a gamut of opinions, ideas and viewpoints — in classroom discussions and readings, in the laboratory, in our studios and performance halls and through the speakers and conferences we host on campus. …
Members of our community have challenged the administration, and each other, on social and political issues, most recently on fossil fuel divestment, sexual assault, international affairs and Tufts’ relations with its custodial staff and part-time faculty. I welcome and encourage these exchanges. With issues as complex as these, we cannot broaden our insights without a full airing of many viewpoints. …
The school won’t tolerate expression that involves “threats, intimidation or harassment” (yes, you can drive a truck through those loopholes), but “we need to protect all points of view, no matter how unpopular or provocative, to advance our mission as an educational institution,” Monaco says:
I have been deeply troubled by calls on our own and other university campuses to silence speech. At some institutions, commencement speakers have been denied the right to be heard. Here at Tufts, we have been urged by members of our own community, both on and off campus, to cancel programs and speakers. When debate is stifled, everyone loses.
I strongly believe that the best response to offensive speech is more speech. And I fervently defend the principles of academic freedom and the right of all members of this community to express their views on any issue.
Tufts president promises to protect speech ‘no matter how unpopular or provocative’ (The College Fix)
Comments
When I was in law school in the turbulent late 1960s, we were taught that free speech was pointless unless it offended and upset somebody: nobody needs the FA to speak about motherhood and apple pie. Now that thinking has been turned on its head in academia: can say anything so long as it doesn’t upset or bother a student. Of course, this completely destroys the purpose of the FA, to protect the expression of unpopular speech, and to foster robust discussion. The new fascists want to bring back sweeping restrictions on free speech, prohibiting any discussion of one religious creed–Islam. It’s all a shabby and illegal attempt to protect Islam from the same critical analysis and skeptical thinking that other religions, mostly Christianity, have been exposed to for hundreds of years. Islam, which means “submission”, would have us submit to its malign world view. Fight back and don’t submit!