UCLA Student Government Abuses Student Fees By Pushing Leftist Political Causes
According to Jacob Kohlhepp at The College Fix, the UCLA student government has found a loophole in university policy about political ethics and is exploiting it to “push a progressive political agenda.”
UCLA abuses student fees to push progressive causes ahead of election
At UCLA, student fees and taxpayer money is used by the student government to push a progressive political agenda on the campus community during election time, an outright violation of university policy regarding political ethics.
So how do they get away with it? The undergraduate student government uses a technicality to all but endorse controversial liberal ballot measures. They also email students, encouraging them to vote on certain measures, stopping just short of saying: “Vote Yes!”
This situation is playing out now with Proposition 47, which proposes a major overhaul of the California criminal code that would reduce penalties for a wide variety of crimes. It’s supported by many left-leaning activists.
Under university policy, the Undergraduate Student Association Council cannot tell students how to vote on ballot measures such as this, as the student government is funded by taxpayer dollars and student fees.
To get around this restriction, some student council members wrote up a resolution stating the student government “supports Proposition 47 on the November ballot,” and the student government as a whole voted to pass the resolution Tuesday by a vote of 11 to 1. The one dissenter was Heather Rosen.
Because no one who opposes the measure would ever support the proposition on the November ballot, the resolution is mostly a euphemism designed to disguise endorsement as encouraging people to vote.
UCLA abuses student fees to push progressive causes ahead of election (The College Fix)
Comments
This issue came up in the 1970s, when I was attending UCSB. The Student government resolved this by allowing students to put their student fees into activities that they supported, not those that the student leaders supported — whatever wasn’t deligated, the leaders could choose, although seems they should just divy undelegated according to how the delegated selected.
Allowing student leaders to decide how other people’s money is spent is sooo much like how unions abuse worker’s union money to fund all sorts of liberal fantasy nonsense. This sort of power abuse should have no place in student government.