U. Michigan student reviews the rise of religious persecution around the world
University of Michigan student Derek Draplin takes a look at the rise of harassment and violence that targets people based on their faith.
For Americans in a modernized world, religious persecution seems like an antiquated and archaic notion rather than an infringement upon liberty and natural rights. In fact, Americans-—millennials, in particular—-dispassionately take religious freedom for granted. This is either because we are less concerned with religion, freedom, or both.
Why should millennials invest their time and energy into defending religious freedom if they are indifferent or less concerned with religion on a personal level? A recent Pew Research study claims that 54% of millennials believe this increasingly non-religious attitude “doesn’t make much difference for American society.”
…Among religious groups between 2006 and 2012, Christians were harassed in 151 countries, while Muslims were harassed in 135 countries, and Jews in 95 countries. It is important to note that Christians and Muslims collectively make up over half of the world’s population.With religious hostilities consistently on the rise, more citizens should be concerned. All the while, the leader of the free world doesn’t seem to be concerned about such rising persecutions. After assuming office in 2009, President Obama dragged his feet for more than two years before nominating an Ambassador for International Religious Freedoms, finally nominating Suzan Johnson Cook. In October 2013, Johnson Cook resigned as ambassador. Ever since her resignation, the post has been vacant with no nominations by the Obama Administration.
“They simply are uninterested in advancing religious freedom around the world,” Dr. Farr told the Review. “It’s not because they are ‘for’ persecution; that’s not it. It’s just not high on their list of priorities. They’re far more interested in advancing other things.”
Other countries see this is not a priority of Obama’s foreign policy concerns. Part of the problem is that the position of Ambassador for International Religious Freedom isn’t taken seriously, only being seen as a figurehead. But with the growing trends hostile to all the major religious sects, the administration needs to prioritize religious freedom abroad.
I would go so far as to say that the Obama Administration’s policy of inaction for religious freedom is more disturbing than its lack of useful action in the Ukraine crisis and the Syrian Civil War. It will be a travesty if Obama doesn’t fill the vacant ambassadorship soon, and it reflects his lack of priority in defending religious freedom globally.
If this administration continues to sit on its hands, anyone concerned with advancing liberty and democracy should and needs to vouch for action to defend religious freedom at home and abroad. It’s up to millennials to apply the pressure and send the message of liberty in defense of those persecuted if the Obama Administration is unwilling to do so.
Comments
If more Muslims were being attacked, Obama would become interested in advancing the cause of religious freedom.
This student notes that Muslims were harassed in 135 countries. Were they harassed or did the fed up population get tired of Islamic aggression and retaliate? Take for instance the Central African Republic (CAR). CAR is predominantly Christian, yet the people ran when Muslims, a small percentage of the population, went on a Christian-killing spree. Eventually, the Christians decided that they had had enough, this last was not the first aggression by Muslims, and the worm turned. Someone decided to cleanse CAR of Muslims one way or another, either by slaughter or by chasing them out of the country.
How did the student classify that? Harassment of Muslims or as necessary action to end Islamic aggression?