Are College Students Guilty of Microaggression?
Have you not heard of Microaggression? Don’t you know it might be making you a racist?
Alec Torres of National Review reports.
Microaggression
As a group of students begins studying for a calculus exam, a white student turns to an Asian peer and says, “Hey, would you mind helping me solve this problem? It’s really difficult, but you can probably do it.” The Asian student agrees to help, but for some reason feels uncomfortable with the way the question was asked.
Is the Asian student being oversensitive? Was the white student subtly and subconsciously displaying racial prejudice against Asians? Could both be true?
According to Dr. Derald Sue, a professor of psychology at Columbia University, the Asian student may have been the victim of a microaggression — an “everyday slight, putdown, indignity, or invalidation unintentionally directed toward a marginalized group.”
Sue has been researching microaggression since 2007 and has written two books on the subject. According to him, the person delivering the microaggression often does not know he’s doing it and might even think he is complimenting the other individual.
“When you try to bring the issue of microaggressions to the attention of people who are completely unaware that they have delivered a microaggression, they get defensive and deny it and tend to say that you’re being paranoid or you’re being oversensitive,” Sue tells me. “Many microaggressions are so subtle that neither target nor perpetrator may entirely understand what is going on.”
According to Sue, there are many types of microaggressions, based on race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other factor that can make a group “socially marginalized.” These microaggressions can be expressed verbally (as with the white and Asian students), nonverbally (as with a woman clutching her purse when a black man walks by), and environmentally (as with an educational curriculum containing few books by female authors).
Comments
“As with a white woman who clutches her purse when a black man walks by.” She could get off if she said that it wasn’t his color, she saw all men as potential purse snatchers and rapists; probably get some sort of award.
The obvious intent of banning “microaggression” is to make any and all actions, statements, or attitudes subject to penalty if someone from a Matsuda Doctrine group decides to be offended. No defense is possible.
I wish they’d at least be a bit more honest and enact codes forbidding “crimethink.”
Two books on the subject, huh? And here I am busting my brain trying to put some meaning into my manuscript.
Who’s his publisher?