Providence College student: What a difference the sex of the sex perp makes
We recently touched upon the lack of campus justice for men involved caught in sex-scandals as a reason many of them are fleeing colleges.
Providence College student Christine Rousselle reviews two cases that offer a compare-and-contrast proof there is reason for male concern.
In 2005, the media exploded when a sex scandal hit Milton Academy, a prestigious preparatory school in Milton, Massachusetts. A sophomore student was caught giving oral sex to five members of the varsity hockey team in their locker room—reportedly as a “birthday gift” to one of the players. The five hockey players were expelled, two who were over the age of 16 were charged with statutory rape (escaping jail time by accepting a plea bargain), and the sophomore student was placed on administrative leave…..
In 2013, the media also exploded when a sex scandal hit Sebastian River High School regarding the sexual activity between Kaitlyn Hunt, an 18-year-old senior, and a 14-year-old freshman student. According to the arrest affidavit, Hunt performed a sex act on the younger student in a bathroom stall and performed oral sex (among other things) on the 14-year-old at a later date (off-campus), leading to her arrest…
The only difference between the two cases is that the Milton Academy scandal involved one 15-year-old girl and five 15-to-18 year-old males, and the Sebastian River High School scandal involved two female students. Apart from that, the two cases are essentially identical.
Gay rights activists have spearheaded the “Free Kate” cause as unfairly targeting Hunt due to her lesbian relationship with a 14-year-old. The “Free Kate” website describes Hunt as being guilty of “anything other than a high school romance”—does this “high school romance” claim not also apply to the members of the Milton Academy hockey team? Boys get charged with statutory rape all the time—where are their Facebook support groups and petitions? This was not the act of a rogue prosecutor: it was proper application of the law.
Additionally, despite the claims of Hunt’s parents, the 14-year-old’s parents did not wait until their daughter was 18 to press charges: the relationship began when Hunt was 18. The Hunt family has been spreading misinformation in order to make the case against Hunt look as though some sort of homophobic actions motivated it. According to the arrest affidavit, this doesn’t appear to be the case.
If Hunt’s name was Kenneth instead of Kaitlyn, this case likely wouldn’t have made a blip on the national news, and pretty much everyone would agree that an 18-year-old performing a sex act on a 14-year-old is wrong and probably illegal, as they did with the Milton case. The “Free Kate” campaign is an attempt to dismiss and condone an illegal sexual relationship involving a young teen on the grounds of a “schoolgirl romance.” This is absurd.
Statutory rape laws and ages of consent exist for a reason: to protect young people who are not emotionally mature enough to consent to sex. We cannot just toss these laws aside due to the sexuality of the participants.
Comments
They’re just treating students like they treat teachers.
Female teacher has sex with a student, pretty much no problem. Male teacher, life without parole
How interesting. The “gay activist” position seems to be that unless homosexuality is privileged in this case relative to heterosexuality it is a case of homophobia.
I wonder how many NAMBLA members have turned out out support the “Free Kate” movement?
Ideally in either case no one would be charged with a crime. It sounds to me no one was doing anything that people their age and older have been doing since time. No high school boy should be charged with a crime for receiving a blowjob from one of his classmates. No girl should be charged with a crime for giving her classmate, male or female, some oral pleasure.
In both cases if I was the prosecutor I would pass on prosecuting anyone.
In both cases if I was the principal everyone involved would be suspended. Although the activity was not wrong the venue was. These kinds of activities should take place off school grounds…unless you don’t get caught.
how is a romantic relationship the same thing as blowing the entire hockey team ?
I don’t think anyone said it was. I think the point was that the sex acts involved are the same, and the punishments under consideration are for the sex acts. If your comment is defending homosexual sex acts under the banner of individual freedom, then it seems you should have no problem with multi-partner consensual sex acts either. Otherwise, you’re just another garden-variety liberal, who is strongly in favor of gay marriage, but feels that polyandry and polygamy is somehow “weird” and should be restricted.
Sorry, was anybody under the impression that the campus sexual infraction system’s aim is equality between the sexes, as opposed to power to women?
I thought it was already decided that oral sex was not sex at all.
I distinctly remember a president told me so!
“We cannot just toss these laws aside due to the sexuality of the participants.”
Sure we can. We’re leftists.