Princeton University Declares Gun Violence ‘Public Health Epidemic’
Generally, when liberals what to enact liberty-crushing regulations, the excuse will be “it’s for the children” or “it’s preventing a serious health crisis”.
Typically, when talking about gun control, children form the “human shield”. However, one progressive school’s take on the issue at least has the benefit of trying to diversify the reasoning….by declaring it a public health crisis!
Princeton University has declared gun violence a ”public health epidemic.”
“In the context of public health, an epidemic is what we face,” said Princeton University President Shirley Tilghman last week.
Tilghman, in her speech at the “Culture of Violence Summit,” hosted May 28 at the Ivy League university, went on to compare gun violence to smoking in public, pollution and car accidents involving children.
All three of those issues have led to what many contend are onerous oversight laws that restrict freedoms. Take, for example, some municipal laws which prohibit apartment dwellers from smoking cigarettes in their own homes. And a state law in California mandates children must use car seats until age 8. As for pollution, there’s an entire government bureaucracy in the EPA created to enforce various regulations.
Nevertheless, those laws passed under the auspices of public health mandates and collective safety. So too could gun-control measures, Tilghman argued.
Tilghman essentially posited that if the gun-violence issue were tackled from a public health stance, like those three issues, the debate would ultimately favor gun-control proponents and lead to stricter gun-control laws.
“If lives are to be saved and injuries reduced, we need to approach this issue not in terms of the Second Amendment — with its hotly contested meaning and appeal to abstract rights — but in terms of concrete national well-being, much as we have dealt with smoking in public settings, industrial emissions, or the use of seatbelts and child restraints in motor vehicles,” she said. “At a fundamental level, we must accept that the problem of gun-related violence directly or indirectly affects us all, and that the campaign against it will not be won by banner headlines but by education, one mind at a time.”
Campus officials, in a news release on the summit, touted Tilghman’s remarks as setting the stage ”for examining gun violence through the same lens as other public health threats.”
Other academics at the conference concurred the strategy could be successful in creating new gun-control laws.
Princeton University Declares Gun Violence ‘Public Health Epidemic’ (The College Fix)
Comments
I like how “rights” are “abstract,” whereas “national well-being” is “concrete.”
I also like how we can bypass the Second Amendment by pretending it isn’t relevant. I suppose we can do the same thing with hate speech by pretending the First Amendment isn’t relevant. “We aren’t restricting speech! We’re promoting the national well-being!”
Seems to me gun violence might be similar to Sickle-cell disease. Seems to be predominant in the same populations. Funny how most gun-control efforts seem to be concerned with the areas least likely to have either.
Why, exactly, is it a “public health epidemic” now when gun violence is in such rapid decline in America but it wasn’t a “public health epidemic” in 1992 when there was roughly twice the gun violence as today?
Many terrorists and tyrants were inspired by–even mentored by–academics. We need to impose draconian limits on what academics can say, starting with those Princeton creeps. Abstract talk of the First Amendment beside the point. If this measure saves even one child it will be worth it.
But all sarcasm aside, a large fraction of academia is openly hostile to freedom and therefore has lost all moral claim on our respect, support, and tolerance.