New Hampshire Teacher: Stop Penalizing Boys Who Can’t Sit Still
One of the points made in Dr. Helen Smith’s new book, Men on Strike: Why Men are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream — and Why It Matters is that the deck is stacked against boys in the American school system.
New Hampshire Jessica Lahey concurs in a controversial essay in The Atlantic:
Something is rotten in the state of boys’ education, and I can’t help but suspect that the pattern I have seen in my classroom may have something to do with a collective failure to adequately educate boys. The statistics are grim. According to the book Reaching Boys, Teaching Boys: Strategies That Work and Why, boys are kept back in schools at twice the rate of girls. Boys get expelled from preschool nearly five times more often than girls. Boys are diagnosed with learning disorders and attention problems at nearly four times the rate of girls. They do less homework and get a greater proportion of the low grades. Boys are more likely to drop out of school, and make up only 43 percent of college students. Furthermore, boys are nearly three times as likely as girls to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Considering 11 percent of U.S. children–6.4 million in all–have been diagnosed with a ADHD, that’s a lot of boys bouncing around U.S. classrooms.
A study released last year in the Journal of Human Resources confirms my suspicions. It seems that behavior plays a significant role in teachers’ grading practices, and consequently, boys receive lower grades from their teachers than testing would have predicted. The authors of this study conclude that teacher bias regarding behavior, rather than academic performance, penalizes boys as early as kindergarten. On average, boys receive lower behavioral assessment scores from teachers, and those scores affect teachers’ overall perceptions of boys’ intelligence and achievement…..
In an attempt to get at what actually works for boys in education, Dr. Michael Reichert and Dr. Richard Hawley, in partnership with the International Boys’ School Coalition, launched a study called Teaching Boys: A Global Study of Effective Practices, published in 2009. …. The responses–2,500 in all–revealed eight categories of instruction that succeeded in teaching boys. The most effective lessons included more than one of these elements:
- Lessons that result in an end product–a booklet, a catapult, a poem, or a comic strip, for example.
- Lessons that are structured as competitive games.
- Lessons requiring motor activity.
- Lessons requiring boys to assume responsibility for the learning of others.
- Lessons that require boys to address open questions or unsolved problems.
- Lessons that require a combination of competition and teamwork.
- Lessons that focus on independent, personal discovery and realization.
- Lessons that introduce drama in the form of novelty or surprise.
Stop Penalizing Boys for Not Being Able to Sit Still at School (The Atlantic)
Comments
[…] […]
[…] CollegeInsurrection […]
My son, aged 11, has always had a much bigger problem getting his work done than his equally-smart nine-year-old sister. He’s an active fellow who excels at physical and mental-and-physical activites. But he “hates” school because of all the “paperwork.”
There ought to be a vocational alternative like a work camp for boys in their teens; let them build a skill in a trade, and then do the three R’s when they are more mature and able to handle sitting for long stretches.
[…] Reading, I wanted to share with you an article from The Atlantic (I came across the link at College Insurrection, a very unconventional site you should check […]
[…] New Hampshire Teacher: Stop Penalizing Boys Who Can’t Sit Still One of the points made in Dr. Helen Smith’s new book, Men on Strike: Why Men are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream — and Why It Matters is that the deck is stacked against boys in the American school system. […]