Are Ivy League Presidents Grossly Overpaid?
In a new post at Dartblog, Joseph Asch laments the massive payday that was given to former Dartmouth President Jim Yong Kim by the college’s board of trustees.
One of the most interesting aspects of the post is the graphic which shows Kim’s salary compared to other Ivy League presidents.
These are non-profit organizations, right?
Trustees Grossly Overpaid Jim Kim Versus Other Ivy League Presidents
The only thing more embarrassing in business than being out-negotiated, is being out-negotiated by a doctor. How did Jim Jim merit, in just his first year as Dartmouth’s President, being paid more money than the presidents of Princeton, Harvard, Brown and Cornell — all of which are far larger schools than Dartmouth, and whose presidents had respectively been on the job for nine, three, nine and four years? Don’t forget that JYK was hardly a seasoned administrator with a long career in undergraduate education; he was just the opposite.
We’re not talkin’ chump change here neither. In 2010, Cornell (which has three and a half times as many students as Dartmouth) paid President David Skorton $230,803 less than Jim Kim. That’s enough money for the College to have hired a senior professor of the highest quality, or perhaps two up-and-coming junior profs.
Our Board is manifestly incompetent. Everywhere you look, they make bad decisions. In the case of Kim, they offered him a fat salary virtually at the same moment that the Dow Jones hit its nadir in the financial crisis (it dipped below 7,000 in early 2009; it is over 13,000 today) and when the value of the endowment was plummeting. All this money to a guy who had not the slightest financial experience.
Trustees Grossly Overpaid Jim Kim Versus Other Ivy League Presidents (Dartblog)
Comments
Ah, but he added value in diversity, which as we know supersedes all else in Academe.